Searched refs:we (Results 1 – 6 of 6) sorted by relevance
225 wordexp_t we; in command_line_test() local227 int retval = wordexp (words, &we, 0); in command_line_test()229 for (i = 0; i < we.we_wordc; i++) in command_line_test()354 wordexp_t we, sav_we; in testit() local373 we = sav_we; in testit()398 if (we.we_wordv[i] != NULL) in testit()404 for (i = 0; i < we.we_wordc; ++i) in testit()405 if (we.we_wordv[i+start_offs] == NULL in testit()424 if (we.we_wordv[i] == NULL) in testit()432 && (we.we_wordc != sav_we.we_wordc in testit()[all …]
316 Well, we need a colon: somewhere318 *** Fail if we don't
820 as long as we use macros.3129 we cannot declare the struct element as const.3707 to make sure we get the correct helper libraries loaded.5247 we can compile without libio.5255 * db2/compat.h: Include <errno.h>, to make sure we get the5256 definition of EFTYPE before we define it ourselves.5898 what we want is smaller than a buffer.5945 static-nss since we don't want hesiod in the static NSS.6409 we only wait for a replay.7952 Don't store into global errno if we already store through[all …]
410 ; do we get the right subexpression when it is used more than once?
78 # of collation remains the same. In glibc we implement CEO and because of79 # that we can reorder the elements to reorder ranges without impacting
248 # marked as failing must fail. For BREs the situation is different, so we375 (we|wee|week|frob)(knights|night|day) - weeknights weeknights387 # okay, we must not match */ inside; try to do that...429 # do we get the right subexpression when it is used more than once?
Completed in 23 milliseconds